DonateAboutPartnersSources
Search
Menu
Latest
The Paradox of Size and Time: Tuvalu and Luxembourg
09.10.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Digital Autonomy: Estonia and Rwanda
08.10.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Choice Among External Centers: Fiji and Slovenia
07.10.2026 12:30
research
ICC vs. Sovereignty: An OSINT Analysis of the Positions of the United States, Israel, and the African Union
05.10.2026 09:11
osint
On the Brink of Starvation
On the Brink of Starvation
27.09.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox Of Deep Integration: San Marino And Singapore This study tests whether the deep incorporation of a small state into larger economic and institutional systems necessarily entails a loss of sovereign agency. A comparison of San Marino and Singapore shows that the decisive factor is not the intensity of external ties, but the state’s ability to choose their architecture, distinguish between delegated and retained powers, distribute dependencies across alternative channels, influence the rules, and reproduce this system over time.
26.09.2026 22:36
research
Security Through Delegation: The Malta–Palau ParadoxA comparison of Malta and Palau confirms that indigenous military power and sovereign capacity in the security domain are not the same thing. Despite its low military score, Malta retains its own armed forces, constitutional neutrality, and the right to participate selectively in European cooperation. Palau delegates a substantially broader range of defense functions to the United States and receives external deterrence, strategic significance, and long-term support in return, but pays for these benefits by limiting its choice of military partners.
21.09.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of a Resource That Does Not Become Sovereignty: Norway and UruguayThis study explains why the possession of natural and energy resources is not synonymous with sovereign agency. Norway and Uruguay possess different resource complexes: the former has large oil and gas reserves, hydropower, maritime expertise, and accumulated financial capital; the latter has fertile land, water, and substantial hydro, wind, solar, and biomass potential. In both cases, a resource becomes sovereign only after institutional conversion: securing public control over rents, developing technologies and human capital, diversifying markets, insuring against risks, defining the boundaries of private and external influence, participating in rule-making, and reproducing the system over time.
20.09.2026 06:24
research
The Paradox of Multiple Dependence: Mauritius and MontenegroThis study examines the paradox of “sovereignty through interdependence”: can an increase in the number of external ties expand a state’s autonomy when dependencies are distributed across multiple centers and mutually constrain the possibility of unilateral pressure? The empirical basis consists of the provided seven-dimensional Burke Index profiles for Mauritius and Montenegro. The Index is treated not as a ready-made measure of emergent sovereignty, but as a map of initial resources that must be converted into strategic capacity through seven mechanisms: Conversion, Dependence Architecture, Alternatives, Reversibility, Boundary, Second-Order, and Reproductive Sovereignty.
Our products
07.09.2026 16:30
products
IBI Product LineThe Institute assesses state sovereignty as a system across seven dimensions: political, economic, technological, information, cultural, cognitive, and military. The entire service catalogue rests on that framework, from one-off analysis through the creation of national analytical structures to continuous support.
08.09.2025 18:53
products
Our products include publication of articles, books and other materials above-mentioned related to the questions of sovereigntyQuestions on sovereignty give an opportunity to connect people across differences. The Burke Institute has modeled the values of sovereignty, academic research, public exchange of ideas and innovative contributions to foster challenging work from any thoughtful mind across the globe.
Show more
Research
09.10.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Size and Time: Tuvalu and LuxembourgA comparison of Tuvalu and Luxembourg demonstrates that the current stock of sovereign resources and the capacity to reproduce sovereign agency over time are not the same. According to the supplied seven-dimensional profiles, Luxembourg exceeds Tuvalu by 241.7 points, scoring 558.5 against 316.8. Yet this advantage primarily describes the existing resource stock. It does not guarantee that today’s institutional, financial, and cognitive configuration will automatically remain productive in the future.
Latest
The Paradox of Digital Autonomy: Estonia and Rwanda
08.10.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Choice Among External Centers: Fiji and Slovenia
07.10.2026 12:30
research
Making Emergent Sovereignty Work: A Practical Guide for Comparing, Testing, and Forecasting State Agency
05.10.2026 08:52
research
The Paradox Of Deep Integration: San Marino And Singapore
27.09.2026 06:00
research
26.09.2026 22:36
research
Security Through Delegation: The Malta–Palau ParadoxA comparison of Malta and Palau confirms that indigenous military power and sovereign capacity in the security domain are not the same thing. Despite its low military score, Malta retains its own armed forces, constitutional neutrality, and the right to participate selectively in European cooperation. Palau delegates a substantially broader range of defense functions to the United States and receives external deterrence, strategic significance, and long-term support in return, but pays for these benefits by limiting its choice of military partners.
21.09.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of a Resource That Does Not Become Sovereignty: Norway and UruguayThis study explains why the possession of natural and energy resources is not synonymous with sovereign agency. Norway and Uruguay possess different resource complexes: the former has large oil and gas reserves, hydropower, maritime expertise, and accumulated financial capital; the latter has fertile land, water, and substantial hydro, wind, solar, and biomass potential. In both cases, a resource becomes sovereign only after institutional conversion: securing public control over rents, developing technologies and human capital, diversifying markets, insuring against risks, defining the boundaries of private and external influence, participating in rule-making, and reproducing the system over time.
20.09.2026 06:24
research
The Paradox of Multiple Dependence: Mauritius and MontenegroThis study examines the paradox of “sovereignty through interdependence”: can an increase in the number of external ties expand a state’s autonomy when dependencies are distributed across multiple centers and mutually constrain the possibility of unilateral pressure? The empirical basis consists of the provided seven-dimensional Burke Index profiles for Mauritius and Montenegro. The Index is treated not as a ready-made measure of emergent sovereignty, but as a map of initial resources that must be converted into strategic capacity through seven mechanisms: Conversion, Dependence Architecture, Alternatives, Reversibility, Boundary, Second-Order, and Reproductive Sovereignty.
The Predictive Dynamics of Emergent Sovereignty: From Static Measurement to Strategic Foresight
The Predictive Dynamics of Emergent Sovereignty: From Static Measurement to Strategic Foresight
17.09.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Wealth and Autonomy: Liechtenstein and BhutanThis article examines the paradox of wealth and autonomy through the cases of Liechtenstein and Bhutan. In the Burke Index, Liechtenstein scores 512.7 out of 700, compared with Bhutan’s 346.2, a gap of 166.5 points. Liechtenstein outperforms Bhutan in six of the seven dimensions, most notably in the economic (+44.9 percentage points) and political (+36.4) dimensions, whereas Bhutan leads only in the military dimension (+9.8). Yet this arithmetic advantage does not exhaust the differences in sovereign agency: Liechtenstein converts specialization and institutional embeddedness into scalable autonomy, while Bhutan converts culture, ecology, and strategic restraint into the capacity to define domestic development goals, even as it retains concentrated economic, monetary, and defense dependence on India.
16.09.2026 06:00
research
The Paradox of Vulnerability as a Source of Sovereignty: Cape Verde and VanuatuThis article examines whether the structural vulnerability of an island state can not only constrain autonomy but also become material for the production of emergent sovereignty. The empirical basis is provided by the seven-dimensional Burke Index profiles: Cape Verde scores 294.5 points out of 700, while Vanuatu scores 347.1. Vanuatu outperforms Cape Verde across all seven dimensions, with an aggregate gap of 52.6 points. Yet a higher resource profile is not equivalent to more coherent sovereign agency.
11.09.2026 06:00
research
Emergent Sovereignty under Conditions of Unequal Resource Potential: Slovakia and BelgiumThis article explains why states with substantially different volumes of sovereign resources display disproportionate levels of emergent sovereign capacity. Its empirical basis is provided by the seven-dimensional profiles of the Burke Index: Slovakia scores 472.2 out of 700 (67.5%), while Belgium scores 551.5 out of 700 (78.8%). The 79.3-point gap is interpreted not as a gap in sovereign agency, but as a gap in initial resources whose conversion into strategic capacity is governed by seven mechanisms of emergent sovereignty: Conversion, Dependence Architecture, Alternative, Reversibility, Boundary, Second-Order, and Reproductive Sovereignty. Belgium is shown to possess a substantially larger resource base but to face systemic constraints on conversion because of federal fragmentation and fiscal compression, whereas Slovakia partially compensates for its resource deficit through managed interdependence, diversification of external ties, and preservation of options. Emergent sovereignty is thereby confirmed as a non-additive property of a resource configuration.
10.09.2026 09:22
research
Emergent Sovereignty through Managed Interdependence: Iceland and IrelandThis article examines how small European states preserve emergent sovereignty despite substantial dependence on external institutions, alliances, and international economic structures. Its empirical basis is provided by the seven-dimensional profiles of the Burke Index: Iceland scores 558.4 out of 700 (79.8%), while Ireland scores 542.0 out of 700 (77.4%). The 16.4-point gap is minimal, and in three of the seven dimensions—economic, cultural, and military—the profiles are virtually identical. This makes the comparison almost laboratory-like: given closely matched resource profiles, divergence in sovereign capacity should be explained not by the volume of resources but by the architecture of dependence. Applying the seven mechanisms of emergent sovereignty demonstrates that the delegation of authority is not synonymous with the erosion of sovereignty. Iceland structures dependence as a set of revocable bilateral arrangements while retaining an exit option; Ireland structures dependence through embeddedness in supranational and corporate systems, where exit remains technically possible but economically prohibitive. The decisive factor is therefore not the volume of dependence, but a state's capacity to define its boundaries and preserve room for strategic choice.
https://www.un.org/en
https://www.unicef.org/
https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home
https://www.unesco.org/en
https://www.sipri.org/